LANCE ARMSTRONG FINALLY Admits to DOPING: ABC

The title of an ABC News article released on January 14, 2013 is “Lance Armstrong ADMITS Doping in Tour de France, Sources Say” (Web-site/URL: http://abcnews.go.com/US/lance-armstrong-admits-doping-tour-de-france-sources/story?id=18211227#.UPTk70PV9o8.twitter).

“Armstrong made the admission in what sources describe as an EMOTIONAL (?) interview with Winfrey to air on “Oprah’s Next Chapter on Jan. 17 (2013)”Was Armstrong GENUINELY “emotional?” Again this is something else which is open to INTERPRETATIONS (Web-site/URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgnAY_eXYbI). Also, isn’t it interesting that LANCE ARMSTRONG becomes a part of “OPRAH‘s Next Chapter”This answers a question that many people have, which is: we WILL see Oprah again and like other journalists, Oprah DOES NOT like talking about herself.

According to Livestrong spokeswoman Katherine McLane, “Armstrong’sSINCERE and HEARTFELT (?) apologygenerated lots of tears”, adding that “he “TOOK RESPONSIBILITY (?)” for the trouble he has caused the foundation:. DID HE REALLY “(take) responsibility?” Again, this is open to INTERPRETATIONS (Web-site/URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgnAY_eXYbI).

According to International Cycling Union (ICU) President Pat McQuaid,,”(speaking) at a news conference in Switzerland announcing the decision (to STRIP Armstrong of his seven Tour de France titles/championships and banning him from competitive professional cycling FOR LIFE)”, “Lance Armstrong HAS NO PLACE in cycling and HE DESERVES TO BE FORGOTTEN in cycling“. WOW That’s a damning criticism. “This is a LANDMARK day for cycling” and NOT a good one/NOT something to be proud of/brag about.

According to a source, speaking to ABC News, a representative of Armstrong’s once offered to make a donation estimated around $250,000 to the agency, as “60 Minutes Sports” on Showtime first reported.

“Lance Armstrong’s attorney Tim Herman denied it. “NO TRUTH to that storyFirst Lance heard of it was today (January 14, 2013). He NEVER made any such contribution or suggestion“. This is the latest ASSERTION.

“Herman told The Associated Press (that) HE HAD NO KNOWLEDGE of Armstrong considering a confession and said: “When and IF Lance has something to say,THERE WON’T BE ANY SECRET ABOUT IT” obviously. Armstrong has been DEFIANT that he has NEVER used Performance Enhancing Drugs (PEDs). Well now, we know THE OPPOSITE is true.

Finally, “Winfrey tweeted the news to her followers last Tuesday night (January 8 2013). “BREAKING NEWS: LOOKING FORWARD to this conversation with @lancearmstrong #nextchapter”   

Finally, even COMMENTATORS are weighing inABC‘s ELIZABETH VARGAS quoted an article entitled: ” Lance admits to VILE BETRAYAL” which she then paraphrased into “live strong, LIE LONGVargas goes on to say that this is THE GREATEST DECEPTION IN SPORTS HISTORYThis is the THIRD story about people who should be role models for the rest of usbut sadly they AREN’T after ROGER CLEMENS, BARRY BONDS and SAMMY SOSA were DENIED entry into the BASEBALL Hall of Fame because they used PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS (Web-site/URL: http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/blog/eye-on-baseball/21527385/hall-of-fame-voters-elect–no-one) and “Hall of Fame track coach (Bev Kearney) resigns after admitting affair with athlete” (Web-site/URL: http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/06/sport/texas-track-coach-resigns/index.html?iref=storysearch). AgainCHEATING IS UNACCEPTABLEWe can’t and MUSTN’T have one set of rules for everyone else and a SPECIAL set of rules for SOSA, CLEMENS and KEARNEYThe one involving KEARNEY is especially DISGRACEFUL because it involves a breach of PERSONAL trust. Student-athletes should be able to LOOK UP TO their coaches who should serve as MENTORS to these young peopleBy engaging in this affairCoach Kearney clearly DID NOT do thatThis should remind us of a FAR MORE SERIOUS scandal involving GAO WEI (Web-site/URL: http://www.qcri.qa/our-people/bio?pid=44) and CUI XILING (Web-site/URL: http://www.hksyu.edu/ba/CuiXiling.html). GAO LIED on his CV because he NEVER WORKED ANYWHERE until AFTER he finished his PhDCui is EVEN MORE DISGRACEFUL because she has A TOTAL OF THREE publications in EIGHT years as a PhD. candidate. However she found the time to have TWO kids in 3.5 yearsThis is DEEPLY troubling because this suggests that Gao & Cui WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ADMITTED to CUHK without this scandal.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s