The title of a recently released ABC News article is “Oscar Pistorius Case: ‘Blade Runner‘ DENIES Charge He Intentionally Killed Girlfriend” (Web-site/URL: http://abcnews.go.com/International/oscar-pistorius-case-blade-runner-denies-charge-intentionally/story?id=18534442).
“in a statement, read by his lawyer”, Pistorius said: “I FAIL TO UNDERSTAND how I could be charged with murder, let alone PREMEDITATED murder because I HAD NO INTENTION to kill my girlfriend. I (vehemently) DENY the accusation“. This is DEFENSIVE (Web-site/URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgnAY_eXYbI). “NOTHING CAN FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH that I PLANNED the murder of my girlfriend“. This is a DEFENSIVE ASSERTION (Web-site/URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgnAY_eXYbI),
“Filled with a “sense of TERROR“, he removed the 9-mm pistol he kept hidden under his bed and, without putting on his prosthetic legs, began shooting through the bathroom door, according to his statement”. This “sense of terror”, again, is a “sense of” INSECURITY, which is also DEFENSIVE (Web-site/URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgnAY_eXYbI).
“I was SCARED and didn’t switch on the light. I GRABBED MY GUN and moved towards the bathroom. I screamed at THE INTRUDER because I did not have my (prosthetic) legs on. I felt VULNERABLE. I fired shots through the bathroom door and TOLD Reeva TO CALL POLICE (?)” “told Reeva to call police?” DID HE DO THIS? Also, on top of this, “scared” and the continued mention of “the intruder” are again DEFENSIVE (Web-site/URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgnAY_eXYbI).
“I walked back to the bed and realized Reeva was not in bed. IT THEN DAWNED ON ME IT COULD BE her in there“. Well, Pistorius should have LOOKED INTO THE BATHROOM TO SEE WHO WAS IN THERE before pulling the trigger
According to Gerrie Nel, the senior state prosecutor, “There is NO possible explanation to support his report that he thought that it was a burglar. Even [in] his own version, he READIED HIMSELF, walked to the bathroom WITH THE CLEAR INTENTION and PLAN to kill the ‘burglar‘ and did so whilst the burglar was HARMLESS and CONTAINED in a toilet. This in itself also constitutes PREMEDITATED MURDER of a DEFENSELESS burglar“. “PREMEDITATED murder of a DEFENSELESS” person is TEN TIMES WORSE than simply murder. EVEN IF this was a burglar, Pistorius could have and should have CALLED POLICE instead of RUSHING FOR HIS GUNS. This sounds like what CLINT ROMESHA did at COP (Combat Outpost Keating) and that action earned him the Medal of Honor. However, Romesha and his teammates/fellow soldiers only rushed for their weapons AFTER CONFIRMING THAT THE TALIBAN/ENEMY FIGHTERS WERE IN THEIR CAMP (Web-site/URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IntqeuWQzUk). This is what Pistorius SHOULD HAVE done, but he didn’t,
“Pistorius said he and Steenkamp were in his bedroom the night before Valentine’s Day (February 13, 2013), when she was doing yoga exercises and he was in bed watching television”. Sounds romantic, doesn’t it? Some people HAVE SEX after yoga. “My prosthetic legs were OFF. We were DEEPLY IN LOVE and I COULD NOT BE HAPPIER. I know SHE FELT THE SAME WAY (?)” “I know she felt the same way?” REALLY? Again this is open to INTERPRETATIONS (Web-site/URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgnAY_eXYbI). “She had given me a present for Valentine’s Day (February 14, 2013) but asked me only to open it the next day (February 15 2013)” WHY?
“Just hours before Pistorius appeared in court, Steenkamp’s family and friends gathered at a Port Elizabeth crematorium for a private funeral”.
Finally, Her (Reeva Steenkamp’s) uncle, Mike Steenkamp, who was choking back tears, “We are here AS A FAMILY and there’s only one thing missing and that’s REEVA” obviously. THERE’S OBVIOUSLY A HUGE HOLE that has been torn in the Steenkamp’s family’s hearts..
To conclude, let’s go back to the title: “Oscar Pistorius Case: ‘Blade Runner‘ DENIES Charge He Intentionally Killed Girlfriend”. This is the/an EXPECTED response from a CELEBRITY (Web-site/URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgnAY_eXYbI).