The title of a recently released CNN article is “Egypt’s leader: ‘ We will BATTLE TO THE END to bring security‘” (Web-site/URL:

“Egypt’s interim leader vowed Thursday (July 18 2013) to fight those who attempt to steer the country into chaos even as supporters of deposed President Mohamed MORSY called for renewed protests against the military-installed government”. So, we can spell MORSI as “Morsy?”

INTERIM (?) President Adly Mansour’s speech came amid FEARS OF WIDENING VIOLENCE, with dozens reportedly KILLED and thousands more injured in CLASHES between Morsy’s supporters and those opposed to his rule”. There are TWO things to note here. First, notice “interim”Secondly, WE HAVE TO WONDER HOW LONG ADLY MANSOUR WILL LAST. “widening violence”“killed”“injured” and “clashes” are all examples of the “force and pain technique” (Web-site/URL:

“Mansour BLAMED the violence on those BENT ON DESTABILIZING THE COUNTRY and pledged to restore SECURITY and STABILITY (?)” There are THREE things to note here. First, “blamed” is the latest example of “Blaming and criticizing” (Web-site/URL: Secondly, “those bent on destabilizing the country” once again sounds like GADHAFI talking about AL-QAEDA or ASSAD talking about “armed gangs”, “armed groups” and “terrorists”. On top of this, Egypt HASN’T HAD “security and stability” FOR A LONG TIME NOW.

“in his first televised address since Morsy was forced from office on July 3 (2013) by the military (SCAF)”, Mansour said: “We WILL NOT be FRIGHTENED or be DISMAYED and THERE WILL BE NO COMPROMISING OR COMPLACENCY OR COMPROMISING WITH THOSE WHO ARE KILLING THE INNOCENT“, as if SCAF ISN’T doing this, making this the latest/yet another example of “We think they made us mad; they think we made them mad and here we go” (Web-site/URL: “We will BATTLE TO THE END TO BRING SECURITY“, making this the latest/yet another example of the “force and pain technique” (Web-site/URL: “WE WILL MAINTAIN THE REVOLUTION (?) THE PAST WILL NOT RETURN (?)” HUH? SCAF REPRESENTS “the past”.

“Mansour, a VETERAN JUDGE before he was tapped as the country’s INTERIM leader  earlier this month (July, 2013), said his country was going through a “DECISIVE phase“. Again, there are TWO things to note here. First, Mansour is a “veteran judge” from the MUBARAK era, an era that many Egyptians want to FORGET. Secondly, “decisive” implies that the “force and pain technique” will be used once again (Web-site/URL: “Some want to push towards the UNKNOWN path and we want it to be towards THE BEST path“. What is “the best path?” Again, this is open to INTERPETATIONS (Web-site/URL: “Some want it to be the start of the CHAOS and we want it to be the start of STABILITY (?)” SCAF represents “chaos”, NOT “stability”.

“Supporters of Morsy, who is backed by the Muslim Brotherhood, were being urged to take to the streets as part of a “Breaking the COUP” rally, while Morsy’s opponents are calling on people to turn out to support the new government and protest “against TERRORISM“. There are THREE things to note here. First, the overthrow of Morsy WAS INDEED a “coup”. Secondly, “Morsy’s opponents” could be SCAF members or sympathizers or they could be DEMOCRATIC (like gsquare86). On top of this, “against terrorism” gives us another example of something that GADHAFI or ASSAD would say as well as another example of “We think they made us mad; they think we made them mad and here we go” (Web-site/URL:

“The U.S. Embassy in Cairo WARNED personnel and American citizens to LIMIT TRAVEL during the protests“. “The Embassy suggests that U.S. citizens LIMIT THEIR MOVEMENTS, AVOID AREAS PRONE TO GATHERINGS and IMMEDIATELY VACATE ANY AREA WHERE CROWDS ARE GATHERING. It is possible that additional demonstrations and acts of civil disobedience may develop elsewhere in Egypt”. This sounds like a SERIOUS threat.

Finally, “The military warned demonstrators “NOT to deviate from PEACEFUL (?) means of expression or resort to violence or vandalism,” according to a statement released to the STATE-RUN al-Ahram Online news agency”.   Again, there are TWO things to note here. First, SCAF is MILITARILY-backed, so how can it be “peaceful?” Secondly,   anything “state-run” CANNOT BE TRUSTED because “state-run (agencies) only SPIT OUT PROPAGANDA.

“The statement also warned: “…Whoever does not abide PEACEFULLY (?) is only EXPOSING HIS LIFE TO DANGER and WILL BE DEALT WITH ACCORDING TO THE LAW“. This is yet another THREAT.

So, we have yet more evidence that Egypt is “(going) down the drain” (Web-site/URL: “battle to the end” is the latest/yet another example of the “force and pain technique” (Web-site/URL: The only change we’re seeing in Egypt is that MORE innocent lives will be lost and MORE people will be oppressed/repressed.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s